IMPOLITENESS IN HELL’S KITCHEN: LAS VEGAS OF SEASON 19

GUNAWAN, FACHRI (2023) IMPOLITENESS IN HELL’S KITCHEN: LAS VEGAS OF SEASON 19. Skripsi thesis, Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing JIA.

[img] Text
S1-2023-43131510190020-ABSTRACT.pdf

Download (682kB)
[img] Text
S1-2023-43131510190020-BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf

Download (336kB)
[img] Text
S1-2023-43131510190020-CHAPTER V.pdf

Download (408kB)
[img] Text
S1-2023-43131510190020-CHAPTER I.pdf

Download (663kB)
[img] Text
S1-2023-43131510190020-COVER.pdf

Download (527kB)
[img] Text
S1-2023-43131510190020-TABLE OF CONTENT.pdf

Download (623kB)
[img] Text
S1-2023-43131510190020-FULL.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (8MB) | Request a copy
[img] Text
S1-2023-43131510190020-REFERENCES.pdf

Download (17MB)

Abstract

This research aims to find the types of impoliteness strategies and their functions, as well as how the response towards its impoliteness in American competitive reality television series Hell’s Kitchen season 19: Las Vegas. This study used descriptive qualitative method, while the data was obtained by watching and observing, and then take notes on the impolite utterances that occurred in that reality show. This research used the Jonathan Culpeper’s theory to analyze the impoliteness strategy and function as well as the theory of Derek Bousfield to analyze the response towards impoliteness. 30 data were found which were then analyzed into three categories, namely strategy, function, and response. In terms of impoliteness strategy, there are 5 bald on record impoliteness (16.7%), 8 positive impoliteness (26.7%), 9 negative impoliteness (30%), 6 data off-record impoliteness (20%), and 2 withhold politeness (6.6%). Then on the impoliteness function, there are 11 affective impoliteness (36.7%), 16 coercive impoliteness (53.3%), and 3 entertaining impoliteness (10%). In addition, in response to impoliteness, there are 13 accepting the FTA (43.3%), 7 defensive countering (23.3%), 5 offensive countering (16.7%), and 5 no response (16.7%).

Item Type: Thesis (Skripsi)
Creators:
CreatorsNIMEmail
GUNAWAN, FACHRINIM43131510190020UNSPECIFIED
contributors:
ContributionContributionsNIDN/NIDKEmail
Advisor 1Hadi, ImronNIDN0430076401imron.h@stba-jia.ac.id
Advisor 2Alam, BenyNIDN0404048507beny.a@stba-jia.ac.id
Uncontrolled Keywords: Impoliteness, strategy, function, response, pragmatics, reality show, Hell’s Kitchen
Subjects: Bahasa dan Sastra > Program Studi Bahasa Asing > Ilmu Linguistik
Bahasa dan Sastra > ILMU BAHASA ASING > Sastra (dan Bahasa) Inggris
Divisions: Program Studi Sastra Inggris
Depositing User: Iwan Kurniawan, S.Sos.
Date Deposited: 25 Oct 2023 06:18
Last Modified: 25 Oct 2023 06:18
URI: http://repository.stba-jia.ac.id/id/eprint/905

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item